Traditional Wellness Wisdom

Evidence of Fetal Tissue in Vaccines: Murder for “Health”

FacebookpinterestFacebookpinterestby feather
I’ve used this web site for education on health and nutrition for some years. I’ve also used the site to educate on the risks of vaccines and other problems in our consumer environments, agriculture/wilderness, business, political, economic and social environments.
For decades, the medical and “science” fields have obscured the fact that they ave been harvesting human (and animal) tissue for their products. In more recent years, some data, research, and conversations have proven transparent on these practices. Some come right out and say the use of this tissue is “absolutely critical”, all the while ignoring that the only way to obtain the tissue is to end the life of an innocent baby. Because we have made the medical and scientific fields the end-all-authority of everything we do concerning health and so much else, we simply turn our heads to this fact, or even outright justify these practices in order to “save lives”. This narrative has taken such hold of the minds of so many, that when it is questioned, the questioning is viewed with contempt and ridicule. Surely anyone questioning the mainstream medical or scientific entities is a right-wing extremist, is delusional, and paranoid.
The facts speak for themselves:
Pricing for cell lines available to purchase from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC):
WI-38 (fibroblast, lung, 12 week fetus)-
MRC-5 (fibroblast, lung, 14 week male fetus) –
HEK-293 (human embryonic kidney) –
WI-26 VA4 (lung, 12 week male fetus) –
CDC excipient list, displaying cell line names in various products. An excipient is additive which stabilizes and/or enhances the therapeutic activity of active ingredients in a vaccine or drug.
Unless you have done some research, substances listed on the excipient list are not necessarily easy to identify. A full understanding of the data requires some inquiry and discussion.
Vaccines on the market contain the following:
  • Chemicals
  • Synthetics
  • Antibiotics
  • Preservatives
  • Genetically-modified/manipulated media
  • Adjuvants (something to stimulate immune response)
  • Stabilizers
  • Human and animal cell lines
Living tissue is necessary to create these products. Because excipients are used in the manufacture and R&D of these products, they are not considered “ingredients”, but residual “fragments”. It is inevitable that these fragments remain in the final product as they are unable to completely filter them out.

Tissue only used from “2 abortions” from the 1960s

In case you have heard that fetal tissue in vaccines is only from “2 abortions from the 1960s”, here’s some additional information on that statement.
Live virus vaccines, all of which contain human and/or animal tissue, cannot use tissue from that long ago. Cell lines aren’t immortal. They cannot replicate indefinitely. And, the longer they replicate, the more tumorigenic and carcinogenic they become. In other words, they are capable of inducing disease in the body, including cancer.
As one example, the Rubella vaccine in which over 80 were used for development:
“The rubella virus clinically named RA273 (R=Rubella, A=Abortus, 27=27th fetus, 3=3rd tissue explant) was then cultivated on the WI-38 aborted fetal cell line. A later research paper by Stanley Plotkin would reveal that 40 more babies were aborted after RA273 was successfully isolated, with virus strains taken from 34 of them.[13A] This means a total of over 80 separate, elective abortions recorded were involved in the research and final production of the present day rubella vaccine: 21 from the original WI-1 through WI-26 fetal cell lines that failed, plus WI-38 itself, plus 67 from the attempts to isolate the rubella virus.” Cog for Life
Since these cell lines cannot be used again and again, there is a need for continual harvesting of tissue.
Due to the nature of the non-immortal state of fetal cell lines, there is a continual need for new, living tissue. What does this mean? Continued, elective abortions occur for ongoing research production of these (and other) products.
A quote from the above linked 2015 study:

“We obtained 9 fetuses through rigorous screening based on carefully specified inclusion criteria… Walvax-2 was derived from a fetal lung tissue, similar to WI-38 and MRC-5, and was obtained from a 3-month old female fetus aborted because of the presence of a uterine scar from a previous caesarean birth by a 27-year old healthy woman.”

“The tissues from the freshly aborted fetuses were immediately sent to the laboratory for the preparation of the cells.”

It shouldn’t make you wonder why the pro-choice movement fights so hard to ensure this practice is legal.
There are also many reports from “fact checkers” which claim that the use of fetal tissue in vaccines is false. The reports then go on to say that there is no human DNA present in the final product, but after a few sentences they do say that human tissue is used in research and development. The language used is a repeated twisting of words to make it seem as though the tissue isn’t used, when in reality, it necessarily must be used in order to create a culture for the products they produce.
Evidence of fetal tissue sale for profit in court proceedings, video testimony, Center for Medical Progress.
The fragments that are contained in the resulting end-product do cause disruptions and ongoing issues in the recipient. Autism is one result, there are many others as discussed in this scientific article.
There are “unacceptably high levels of fetal DNA fragment contaminants” that remain in vaccines developed in human fetal cell lines. Although in trace amounts, the fragments are still biologically active after injection into the recipient. Vaccines are designed to cause immune response which causes an inflammatory reaction. This process increases the likelihood of foreign DNA into the genome of the host. Dr. Theresa Deisher, MD, a genetic scientist explains how spontaneous integration of fetal cell DNA into the genome of the vaccinated recipient occurs (known as insertional mutagenesis).
Residual foreign human DNA and retroviral DNA contaminants in vaccines could contribute to various mutations and diseases in infants and toddlers via DNA uptake and incorporations into their vulnerable cells and genome.
“In 1979, coincident with the first autism disorder change point, vaccine manufacturing changes introduced human fetal DNA fragments and retroviral contaminants into childhood vaccines (Victoria et al., 2010). While we do not know the causal mechanism behind these new vaccine contaminants and autistic disorder, human fetal DNA fragments are inducers of autoimmune reactions, while both DNA fragments and retroviruses are known to potentiate genomic insertions and mutations (Yolkenetal.,2000; Kurth1998; USFood and Drug Administration 2011).”
Here is an excellent article from Marcella-Piper Terry with more specifics on this topic including a break-down of the excipient list and a description of the various items that appear, as well as other discussions about the procurement of living tissue for vaccine development and production, with references. Her interview with Polly Tommey on religious exemptions and the use of fetal tissue in ongoing vaccine production.
FacebookpinterestFacebookpinterestby feather